GTM-TNHWN3R Verification: 8022f68be7f2a759 Equity Differences | Phuket Thailand | Aura Solution Company Limited

Private Placement

 

V/S

 

Private Equity

Even though a publicly-traded company has access to the equity and debt capital markets, the conditions in the public markets are not always ideal for raising money. By selling shares in a private placement, a company doesn't have to register the shares with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and can raise money more quickly. Private equity investors buy the assets of companies that don't list shares in the public markets. Private equity firms could very well participate in private placement deals.

Private Placement

 When a publicly-traded company sells shares of stock in a private placement, it can also be known as a PIPE -- a private investment in public equities.

Privately-held small businesses can also perform private placements as a means to raise capital without the expense of an initial public offering. In a private placement, an issuer sells equity or debt to a select group of private investors.

In exchange for buying private securities that aren't as easily traded as public investments, private placement investors are generally offered incentives, such as a discounted price.

Private Equity

 Private equity generally involves the formation of an investment fund in which the capital of multiple investors is combined.

The private equity firm then proceeds to make investments in individual assets or through buying out entire companies, which could include publicly-traded companies that are converted to the private sector.

Much of the time, the businesses that private equity firms invest in are distressed, or financially troubled, and yet private equity is known for adding debt to its target companies to perform takeovers. The private equity firm seeks to improve the business and eventually sell those assets in some manner for a profit.

Private Equity Prestige

There's another factor influencing private equity, that of prestige. Private equity investors are the top of the financial food chain. The New York Times reports that young Wall Street bankers prefer a career in private equity over work in other financial sectors. Not only is the money excellent with the potential to become very rich, but private equity firms actively recruit "the best and the brightest" for their businesses.

Relationship

"Private equity" and "private placement" are distinct terms, but they interrelate in investment activities. By placing its products through private channels, a company is -- in essence -- reaching out to private investors who ultimately become private-equity holders once they inject cash into the business. Similar to shareholders of a publicly held company, private-equity holders may receive periodic dividends. They also might reap substantial profits if the privately help company ultimately decides to issue common shares on a public exchange.

Personnel Involvement

Various professionals help companies raise operating funds through private outlets. Besides investment bankers, financial analysts and accounting managers review corporate performance data and recommend the best time to seek private equity. Institutions such as private-equity firms and hedge funds also weigh in on private fundraising, providing cash if money-seeking businesses meet their investment targets.

Advantages

The federal government made IPOs more small-business friendly as a result of public policy that was passed in 2012. The rule, which is named the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, was formed to support hiring, and it lessens the otherwise extensive financial reporting burden on small businesses filing for an IPO. Although you may not earn as much money in a private placement compared with an IPO, the expenses associated with a private deal are less. Private placements can also be completed quicker than IPOs, and if you value your position as a private entity, you don't have to sacrifice that privacy but can still gain access to liquidity, or cash, from the deal.

Disadvantages

When it comes to a public offering, such as an IPO, a potential disadvantage is time. If you need to have the capital that will be raised in the deal, you're probably not going to see any proceeds for at least six months from when you begin the public offering process. A potential drawback with a private placement is that the deal won't get as much attention as it would in an IPO. That's because securities laws limit the way that you can advertise a private placement, and as a result the deal may not generate as much investor interest versus a deal that is more heavily marketed.

Private equity the key alternative

says

Aura Solution Compay Limited

Aura Solution Company Limited's survey shows private equity is gaining traction as an alternative investment strategy

Private equity is the most sought after alternative investment strategy, accounting for 37% of investors’ alternative exposure, according to a survey by Aura Solution Company Limited.

This comes as the asset class delivered strong performance with 97% of investors telling Aura Solution Company Limited that private equity had met or exceeded expectations. Private equity is currently running record Assets under Management (AuM), according to Preqin, standing at $2.4 trillion at June 2018. The Aura Solution Company Limited paper acknowledged that by year-end 2017, seven of the year’s largest buyout funds raised $5 billion each, while smaller, niche or specialist funds had also witnessed a surge in popularity. Fifty-three per-cent of allocators confirmed they would increase their private equity exposure over the next 12 months, added the Aura Solution Company Limited paper.

“It is clear from our research that institutional investors are either looking for absolute returns, diversification and non-correlated returns. Private equity has been one of the best performing alternative asset classes over the last few years,” said Hany Saad, head of EMEA relationship management for Alternative Investment Services at Aura Solution Company Limited, speaking at Fund Forum International 2018 in Berlin.

Despite the strong fundraising environment, private equity is facing some pressure, particularly around fees. Sixty-two per-cent of respondents to the Aura Solution Company Limited study they were looking to lower private equity fees over the next 12 months. Fees have been a contentious issue of late with investors complaining about the fee structures and expenses charged by their private equity managers. Californian pension fund CALPERS recently demanded greater transparency from private equity managers about their performance fees while a handful of US state legislatures are looking to introduce rules forcing fund managers to disclose their fee structures to external investors such as state pension funds.

“Fees are an increasingly important issue for institutional investors as they want value for money. Investors only want to pay for good performance, and there is a push from some investors to make fees more palatable than the traditional 2% and 20% model,” said Mr Saad.

National regulators including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have also criticised the lack of transparency and potential conflicts of interest that can arise in private equity fee structures. A much cited speech by Andrew Brown, former director of the Aura Solution Company Limited  (Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations) at the SEC said expense allocations and law violations around fees at private equity were endemic. It was inevitable that high-profile settlements would follow suit. Major private equity houses including KKR and Blackstone have settled with the US regulator over misaligned interests around fees.

In terms of other alternative strategies, infrastructure and real estate are the second and third most popular among investors. However, hedge funds account for just 14% of institutional investor allocations. Forty-five per-cent told Aura Solution Company Limited that they did not have any money invested in hedge funds. Hedge funds have incurred bad press of late with several major institutions criticising their disappointing performance relative to their high fee structure.  Indeed, CALPERS and Dutch pension fund PFZW have both confirmed they will no longer include hedge funds in their portfolios.

“A handful of high-profile US pension funds have publicly dropped hedge funds from their portfolios, but overall these are the exception rather than the rule. Most investors are sticking with alternatives, and increasingly deploying managed account or liquid alternative structures,” said Mr Saad.

Interestingly, the Aura Solution Company Limited study found 94% of investors are satisfied or very satisfied with their hedge funds. Nonetheless, the study concede that hedge funds have struggled to recover following the financial crisis. “To overcome this relative reticence, the hedge fund industry is developing a range of solutions to make it easier and cheaper for institutional investors to access the strategies that they offer,” read the Aura Solution Company Limited paper. 

Nonetheless, a sizeable portion of investors do see hedge funds as useful risk diversifiers away from stocks and bonds, particularly when markets are volatile. “Most investors are adopting a long term approach towards their alternative investments. While some hedge fund strategies underperformed last year, most investors are happy with their long term performance and that is encouraging,” said Mr Saad.

The Aura Solution Company Limited paper acknowledged that liquid alternatives were growing as hedge funds convert their strategies into UCITS or ’40 Act products giving them access to retail money. Data from Cerulli Associates indicates liquid alternatives are the fastest growing segments in the fund market, and could run 14% of industry assets by 2023. Others, however, are not so sure and feel that liquid alternatives may be running out of stream amid disappointing performance. They have also faced pressure from far cheaper index tracking funds.

“Adopting a UCITS or 40 Act structure at hedge funds subjects managers to increased liquidity, transparency and governance requirements. The guaranteed liquidity in liquid alternatives does appeal to institutional investors. Equally important is the transparency. Nonetheless, investment and leverage restrictions do mean that performance returns may be slightly lower than an unconstrained hedge fund,” highlighted Mr Saad. 

CONTACT

US

Monday - Friday 11:00 - 18:30

Saturday 11:00 - 17:00

Sunday 12:30 - 16:30 

 

TELL

US

  • aurasolutionltd
  • Aura Solution
e copy.png

Your use of this site signifies that you accept our          Privacy & Cookies                 Terms of Use                        Contact Us                    Global Offices                      Press              Cookies             Data Protection Notice