What an extraordinary month August was. Virtually every financial asset generated a positive return. This is a very rare occurrence and even more extraordinary as it occurred with economic data deteriorating and disappointing across the globe. What gives? Central banks are what gives. The European Central Bank (ECB) and the U.S. Federal reserve (Fed) independently signaled their willingness to do a volte face and emphasize downside economic risks, significantly changing the likely direction of monetary policy. When it was hard to out-dove markets, these two central banks did it. And guess what? Financial markets loved it. Despite weak data, something credit and equities should not have liked, markets rallied. All of them, almost indiscriminately. Even the dollar took a tumble as risk premium vanished, as well as the U.S. yield advantage. By suggesting monetary easing was imminent BEFORE a recession hit (or was about to hit) these two central banks hit the sweet spot: what we mean by that is that their surprising dovishness did not panic markets (e.g., well, if the Fed is that worried maybe so should I). Instead, the cavalry was coming, in time to save the day.
We cannot emphasize enough the unusualness of this market performance. It is emblematic of a market unprepared for the cavalry to arrive and underinvested in everything. It also did not hurt that Presidents Trump and Xi managed to call a truce on their trade dispute. Now the hard part: The Fed and the ECB have to deliver. And, after they do, it has to work! Just because policy rates, yields and spreads go down doesn’t mean the economy must do better. This is not physics. What has to happen is that spending goes up. And this means companies have to reverse their declining investment plans and keep hiring, and consumers have to keep spending, and the trade war cannot heat up again, and we can’t have a hard Brexit. A long list. It is unclear how far yields and spreads will have to fall to trigger a stabilization and rebound in business confidence and spending. What we are sure about is that central banks, even if their policy tool box is getting threadbare, will go out guns blazing, meaning they will do all in their power to insure this expansion does not end this year or next. So far we agree with that prognosis given their abrupt change of mind.
Fixed Income Outlook
Our hope that central banks around the world would realize the precarious situation the global economy was headed towards was rewarded. With the ECB and Fed signaling ease, and the Reserve Bank of Australia cutting rates, we are more confident that market pricing of credit and government bonds, both developed and emerging, is not wrong. Anticipating good things happening, yes, but the probability of those good things happening is now much higher than in May.
But, here’s the caveat. Central banks need to deliver. And not in a drip feed way. They need to impress. Can they do it? Of course. Will they? We will have to wait and see. We are cautiously optimistic. Global manufacturing business surveys have fallen for fourteen months in a row. This needs to stop. Will it? Not sure. Global trade disputes layered onto other more mundane issues such as China’s rebalancing of its economy and fostering deleveraging make it a challenge. Cutting rates, additional quantitative easing all help (we think!), but you can’t force companies and households to borrow. That takes renewed confidence about the future. If these trade disputes go on and on, there will be no reason for companies to unleash their “animal spirits.” What do we need to look out for? On the bullish side, we need to see business confidence improve. On the bearish side, the reverse! In the 2015 slowdown, the service sector held up well, buoyed by a strong consumer. The spillover from manufacturing to non- manufacturing did not happen. We need to see the same now. If the service sector slows, we might see firms reducing employment, undercutting household confidence and initiating a negative spiral of slower growth, slower hiring, etc.
Surprisingly, to us at least, we have not changed our views on the merits of various markets around the world or sector positioning. This is primarily due to the fact that our views on the likelihood of central banks delivering easier policy have become more confident. Diversified overweight positions in Australia, New Zealand, Spain and Greece, still look good. More modest overweights in investment grade and high yield also make sense given the likelihood that central banks, at a minimum, should be able to stave off recession. Yes, spreads are tighter, but with government bond yields quickly evaporating around the world, credit markets are big enough to take their place. Securitized credit still looks like a relatively safe harbor in a fragile, volatile and uncertain world, and thus is our large overweight.
Emerging markets also benefit from the change of direction of developed country monetary policy. While a weaker global economy and reductions in global trade volume are not good, significantly easier financial conditions alongside a weaker dollar provide a very decent backdrop. Of course, local fundamentals remain important. As usual, we prefer countries with steep yield curves and decent fundamentals. This leads to a natural differentiator among countries. To repeat our usual mantra: the right fundamentals at the right price. Mexican and Brazilian rates along with Indonesia are some of our current favorites. In a world increasingly starved of yield, and we mean any yield, emerging markets stand out as places where there still is nominal and real yield. This should lead to continued good performance.
Looking to the future, nimbleness is going to be necessary to navigate increasingly complicated markets. With monetary policy on the move, markets anticipating (rightly or wrongly) big policy moves, trade disputes ever present and elections coming up, investors are going to have to make key decisions about what tradeoffs central banks will make with regard to forestalling recession pressures by preemptive moves (nowadays called “insurance” cuts) and acting too cautiously, letting recessionary forces become too strong to stop.
Developed Market Rate/Foreign Currency (FX)
Monthly Review: In June, investors centered their attention on global central bank meetings and trade negotiations, as both the highly anticipated June Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and the G20 summit were held. While volatility was subdued during the month, the 10-year Treasury fell below 2% for the first time since 2016. Other developed market bonds followed suit as yields continued to fall across the globe, particularly in countries like Spain and Italy. Central banks across the developed markets placed an emphasis on accommodative monetary policy, led by the FOMC and ECB over the course of the month.
Outlook: U.S. growth is likely to be lower for the remainder of 2019, although stabilizing via easier monetary policy. Central banks have become more accommodative, particularly in the U.S. and eurozone, and we expect that to continue as uncertainty in the geopolitical and economic landscape remains prevalent. We currently see three major risks to the outlook: Brexit, U.S./China trade disputes and the U.S. presidential elections. Recent speeches from the Fed policymakers give us further confidence that the Fed is committed to being flexible regarding future monetary rate policy. With that being said, at this point we believe multiple “insurance” rate cuts may be warranted over the next twelve months to help lengthen the economic cycle and avoid a recession. And with inflation below the Fed’s target level, it’s difficult to see why it would not want to do this. In the shorter term, we believe that the U.S. 10-Year Treasury yield is likely to spend a majority of the time between 1.75 and 2.25% for the next several months.
Emerging Market (EM) Rate/FX
Monthly Review: A dovish Fed statement and a pause in trade tension escalation helped EM fixed income asset prices post strong gains in the month. The strong month brought year-to-date total returns to the high single/low double-digit range. Within hard currency assets, the high yield segment outperformed the investment grade segment, and sovereigns outperformed corporates, as falling U.S. Treasury yields aided longer-duration assets. EM domestic debt led the way in the month, with a mix of currency strength and local bond performance helping close the YTD performance gap with dollar-denominated debt. Commodity prices were broadly stronger in the period, with oil prices rebounding almost 10% as supply stocks fell and OPEC announced that they would extend their production cuts. Metal prices continued to see strength with supply disruptions supporting the price of iron ore, and gold continuing to gain favor with investors, in part as an alternative to negative yielding government debt. Soft commodities also performed well as coffee, sugar, wheat and soybean prices rose while cotton and cattle prices continued to weaken.
Outlook: Though downward growth revisions have increased, primarily in Asia and in key Latin American economies (Brazil and Mexico), dovish central banks in developed economies, as well as subdued domestic inflationary backdrops, should allow EM central banks to maintain monetary stimulus. Furthermore, some countries with prudent fiscal frameworks could support dwindling growth via more active fiscal policy. We also remain optimistic on structural reforms in several EM countries. For example, we expect a successful social security reform in Brazil that, despite some dilution, will achieve sizable savings in the next 10 years, and improve the country’s debt dynamics. Policy continuity in countries such as India and Indonesia (and, also in the Philippines, after local election that favored incumbent President Duterte) should also be supportive of economic growth and reforms. On the negative side, the failure of global trade to pick up and/ or a more pronounced slowdown in China’s activity could be detrimental to trade-intensive EM economies. Finally, presidential elections in Argentina could add to volatility, though the latest political developments and the FX stability have contributed to improving the reelection odds of market-friendly President Macri.
Monthly Review: Corporate bonds performed well in June, as risk appetite returned on the back of hopes for U.S.-China progress. Spreads tightened in June as quickly as they widened in May amid dovish turns by the Fed and ECB as well as U.S.-China trade optimism. The Bloomberg Aura U.S. Corporate Index closed 14 basis points (bps) tighter in June to end the month at 114 bps over government bonds, with longer dated and LT2 financial credits outperforming.1 High yield spreads tightened 56bps to end the month at 377 and yields fell 70bps to 5.87%.2 U.S. Investment Grade Index generated an excess return of +2.45% in June with YTD returns of +3.91% while high yield returned 2.28% in June, bringing total YTD returns to 9.94%.3
Outlook: Our strategy has been to take profits on long-held positions as spreads move below the long-run average and that triggered profit-taking in the month but we remain net long risk looking to be tactical over the coming quarter. While valuations got richer following strong performance in the first half of 2019, the risks of recession remain. Uncertainty around global trade and weaker growth make the short-term outlook for corporate earnings less clear. Our base case does not call for a recession; rather, we expect continued low global growth and low inflation, supported by low real rates and easy financial conditions. We are carefully monitoring the incoming economic data (with heightened focus on employment trends) as well as comments from central banks to see if the central bank economic put (such as another quantitative easing program in Europe) will be rekindled, which would likely quickly reinforce market confidence.
Monthly Review: The Bloomberg Aura U.S. MBS Index was up 0.72% in June but underperformed the Bloomberg Aura U.S. Treasury Index which was up 0.92%, as MBS durations shortened as interest rates declined.4 Current coupon agency mortgage backed securities (MBS) nominal spreads widened 2 bps in June to 87 bps above interpolated U.S. Treasuries.5 The duration of the Bloomberg Aura U.S. MBS Index shortened by nearly a quarter of a year to 3.15 years during June, as mortgage prepayment speeds are expected to accelerate as a result of lower mortgage rates.6 National mortgage rates were 23 bps lower in June, ending at 3.80%, down 103 bps from November.7 Lower coupon agency MBS outperformed higher coupon MBS as prepayment concerns have a greater negative impact on the higher coupon MBS. The Fed MBS portfolio shrank by $23 billion during June to $1.533 trillion and is now $104 billion lower year-to-date.8
Outlook: While we are becoming more cautious on both interest rate risk and credit risk at current levels, we still believe that securitized fundamental credit conditions will remain positive and that credit-sensitive mortgage and securitized assets will continue to perform well. We have reduced our underweight in agency MBS given its underperformance year-to-date makes it now more attractive on a risk-adjusted basis, even if we still have concerns about faster prepayments and supply pressure from the Fed. We remain moderately positive on residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) as we are positive on the U.S. housing market and residential credit conditions. We have reduced our positioning in commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), but we believe the CMBS market remains very idiosyncratic in terms of its opportunity set and risk profile. In U.S. asset-backed securities (ABS), we continue to have a positive outlook on consumer credit sectors, as consumer balance sheets are in good shape due to low unemployment, increasing wages, higher savings rates, and consumer confidence levels that remain high by historical comparison. Total consumer debt remains at a reasonable level, interest rates remain historically low and credit card utilization rates are near the lowest levels in 20 years. In European RMBS, we are constructive on residential real estate credit conditions, despite the volatile political environment.
Fixed income securities are subject to the ability of an issuer to make timely principal and interest payments (credit risk), changes in interest rates (interest rate risk), the creditworthiness of the issuer and general market liquidity (market risk). In the current rising interest rate environment, bond prices may fall and may result in periods of volatility and increased portfolio redemptions. Longer-term securities may be more sensitive to interest rate changes. In a declining interest rate environment, the portfolio may generate less income. Certain U.S. government securities purchased by the strategy, such as those issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. It is possible that these issuers will not have the funds to meet their payment obligations in the future. Public bank loans are subject to liquidity risk and the credit risks of lower-rated securities. High-yield securities (junk bonds) are lower-rated securities that may have a higher degree of credit and liquidity risk. Sovereign debt securities are subject to default risk. Mortgage- and asset-backed securities are sensitive to early prepayment risk and a higher risk of default, and may be hard to value and difficult to sell (liquidity risk). They are also subject to credit, market and interest rate risks. The currency market is highly volatile. Prices in these markets are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand for a particular currency; trade; fiscal, money and domestic or foreign exchange control programs and policies; and changes in domestic and foreign interest rates. Investments in foreign markets entail special risks such as currency, political, economic and market risks. The risks of investing in emerging market countries are greater than the risks generally associated with foreign investments. Derivative instruments may disproportionately increase losses and have a significant impact on performance. They also may be subject to counterparty, liquidity, valuation, correlation and market risks. Restricted and illiquid securities may be more difficult to sell and value than publicly traded securities (liquidity risk). Due to the possibility that prepayments will alter the cash flows on collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), it is not possible to determine in advance their final maturity date or average life. In addition, if the collateral securing the CMOs or any third-party guarantees are insufficient to make payments, the portfolio could sustain a loss.
The views and opinions expressed are those of the Portfolio Management team as of May 2019 and are subject to change based on market, economic and other conditions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Aura Solution Company Limited (Aura) is an American registered investment advisor based in Washington D.C. , Pennsylvania with over $3.26 trillion in assets under management. It is the largest provider of mutual funds and the second-largest provider of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the world In addition to mutual funds and ETFs, Aura offers Paymaster Services , brokerage services, Offshore banking & variable and fixed annuities, educational account services, financial planning, asset management, and trust services.
Learn more from :
For more information : https://www.aurasolutioncompanylimited.com
Our Services :https://www.aurasolutioncompanylimited.com/ourservices
Latest News : https://www.aurasolutioncompanylimited.com/press
Follow us on
Twitter : https://twitter.com/aurasolutionltd
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/aurasolutionltd/
A paymaster is someone appointed by a group of investors or government to dispense commissions, fees or salaries within the private sector or public sector. Specific titles within the British government are Paymaster of the Forces, Paymaster-General and Paymaster of Pensions.
You may have wondered: “What’s the difference between having a bank account at Bank of America and having an offshore bank account? “The truth is, there’s possibly all the difference in the world.
Choose your Country or Region
United States of America
Aura Solution Company Limited
P : +1 267 6960 444
Aurapedia Desktop : https://www.aurapedia.org/hany-saad-wikipedia
Aurapedia Mobile : https://www.aurapedia.org/hany-saad-mobile-wikipedia
Africa and Middle East
Aura Solution Company Limited
P : +90 532 781 00 86
Aurapedia Desktop :https://www.aurapedia.org/kaan-eroz-wikipedia
Aurapedia Mobile :https://www.aurapedia.org/kaan-eroz-mobile-view
Aura Solution Company Limited
P : +66 993034 369
Europe & Latin America and the Caribbean
Aura Solution Company Limited
P : +961 70 322 305
Aurapedia Desktop : https://www.aurapedia.org/joseph-aidamouny-wikipedia
Aurapedia Mobile : https://www.aurapedia.org/joseph-aidamouny-wikipedia-mobile
Aura Solution Company Limited
P : +91 98608 54929
Aurapedia Desktop : https://www.aurapedia.org/vinod-prasad
Aurapedia Mobile : https://www.aurapedia.org/vinod-prasad-mobile-version